From the moment I entered the cinema hall on June 18th for the early noon show of the Tamil version entitled 'Raavanan', and until I finished watching the evening show of the Hindi version, 'Raavan', what I witnessed was a series of pleasant surprises and some sour disappointments. Believe it or not, the Hindi version scores over the Tamil!
Mani Ratnam was the only director in India, who handled melodrama in the most natural way; and that was evident in his films like Nayagan, Roja, Bombay, Alayipayuthe, and even the recent Guru. But after watching Raavan/Raavanan, I' am forced to rub off that very statement from my head, because right from the start, whatever happened on screen seemed to be contrived and artificial at most parts, with the very character of Raavan not even being properly established!Well, the basic premise, inspired from the Indian epic Ramayana is entirely predictable, but a taut screenplay would have done the job! When the Tamil version suffers hugely from a bad casting and a far from great performance from the usually dependable actor, Chiyan Vikram, the Hindi version excels in the performance section, but falls flat on the screenplay, which is a total mess in both cases! But as far as I have analysed, the Hindi version has a far better execution than the Tamil version.
The cinematography by Santhosh Sivan & V. Manikandan oozes sincerity and demands a standing ovation; The visuals add life to every dull moment, and remains the best part of this king size film. The DI is of international quality, and the expert colouring adds to the beauty. The music by AR Rahman is brilliant, but the background scores disappoint to a large extent! Veterian editor Sreekar Prasad saves the film from drowning down into the heavy rain forests, which is continuously wet! Samir Chanda makes every frame rich with his intelligent use of vibrant colours and art work. The actions scenes by Peter Hein are exquisitely shot with a lot pain and passion, which is evident on screen, as those are the only parts where the theater comes alive, with excellent use of Sound by Tapas Nayak.
ALTERNATE TAKE
If I were Sreekar Prasad, and if the footage appears to be poorly directed, I would have opted for a simple, linear editing pattern for Raavan, rather than screwing up in the non linear pattern.
Leaving its negatives apart, the film surely has its moments. For instance, take a look at that scene, in which the character of Dev pierces the burning cigarette into a mere newspaper cutting! Well, that Mani Ratnam magic is hidden somewhere deep inside, but sadly doesn't come out. And moreover, each frame of the film is a separate, million dollar visual, which will take your breathe away; the credit goes largely to Mani Ratnam's vision as a director! Raavan puts you in a rather awkward situation, when you almost forget that you are watching a movie, and start rating the beautiful shots individually! And I have to admit that most of the film's major flaws went unnoticed by me during my first watch of Raavanan, and later on ended up noticing a few in the Hindi Raavan, mainly due to the above mentioned reason.In the end when you leave the theater, all you remember is the stunning camera work, the nerve pumping action scenes, and a little bit of brilliance spread out in the 2 hour 7 minute saga! Raavan falls short of the expectations, but indeed is worth the money you pay for the ticket. I give a generous three out of five for the Hindi version and two out of five for the Tamil version. Its far from being a classic, but nevertheless entertains to an extent!
Tamil Raavanan: 2/5
(Watch the trailers again; they were far more superior)Raavan is a proof to the fact that Mani Ratnam's film making style, is drowning away now; This is is just a stupendous piece of eye candy! Where are those subtle, dramatic moments, which used to fill our senses with pleasure, passion, gut and energy? Where are those smart dialogues? Where is the screenplay? Everything is missing here.
For instance, take a look at this scene, from Mani Ratnam's recent Hindi film, Guru, which is among my personal favorites. Its simply mesmerising, the way Mani's drama unfolds- with excellent dialogues, sharp timing, and mind boggling background scores! This is what you call BRILLIANCE!
Thank you for reading!

12 comments:
Man...Awesome review...but no offence I am always into this MR films...so...you know...words you have scribbled ova ere 's so cool..you are true may be but RAAVAN ROCKS!!!!
impressive,will watch if would get a chance.keep posting.
Abhi,
this is one of the best review you have written, according to me. Very detailed insights of both movie and at the same time keeping it short.
I haven't seen the movie yet, so wait for my review till sunday.
Thanks,
Suraj
Wash your eyes and go for the movie.
You cant compare the acting of Vikram with Abhi. Vikram is far better than Abhi as Ravanan. Abhi is good but not better than Vikram. Just shouting as Ravan is not the meaning of Acting. The Emotions shown against Ragini where delivered excellent by Vikram, where abhi fails to do that.
While comes to Dev, Prithvi is having the same angry emotions all over the movie, where in Hindi Vikram done it superb.
One of the best BGM by Rehman in Mani movie.
The only thing I agree with you is about the script. The script was loose. But other things like cinematography, acting, Dialogues and BGM keeps you engaged.
A perfect movie.
TO ALL THE REVIEW WRITERS. STOP COMPARING AND WATCH THE PRESENT.
Sorry to say this.
Thumbs down for this review
@Abhinav:mate am a friend of KB..
i agree to many of ur views abt the tamil version but i doubt some of them.. The dialogues when veera at parisal(the wooden boat) to ragini was very good.. A good example that those are never cheesy dialogues.yes indeed sujatha's gap is hard to fill but the dialogues fit in the screen perfectly well except with the clumsy fillers..and i think the complexity of a person like veera is expressed very well..Still i like ur review unlike others who mercilessly bashed the movie.. yet to watch hindi version so dont know how vikram was bad .Not the best from mani but i think it's more than a good attempt
dude...in list of mani ratnams best..where is YUVA (hindi)...
u had a fantastic guy called Michael Mukherji in it ;-)
Anyway read ur review, nice. Yet to watch ravanan (T)
heya...!! nice review indeed.. i'm no big critic n i know i'm an amateur but still, i prefer vikram's acting to abhishek's.. vikram gets all those emotions right n i guess he's d one who merges more into veera's character than abhishek..
d script was indeed loose but as a viewer, i loved d cinematography..
hi bro i saw raavanan film its Awesome ..... it a ramayana climax it a descent love & action
I dont know how you are reviewing just opposite to actual and getting applauds as awesome review its really funny man, if u dont know to review properly just stop doing that.
@ ALL: Reviews are never consistent. Its an opinion, coming out of a particular analysis. You are also free to post your opinions. By the way, I have also deleted all our conversations, leaving only the comments on this page.
Thank you for your keen interest.
Raavanan vs Raavan
Vikram as Veera 'shouts with expression'
Abhishek 'shouts without expression'
Vikram 'good acting as DEV,but his HINDI SLANG degrades him'
Pritvi 'good acting + good slang'
IMO
Vikram scores as Veera but fails as DEV
Pritvi - Right choise by MR
Abhishek - #OVERREACTION TO THE OVERHYPE#
Post a Comment